1 - Ellisvillereb
- Member
Offline 
- From: Ellisville Ms.
- Registered: 8/01/2017
- Posts: 1,368
If It Wasn't For That ?#! $! Dan Mullen Article
- Semper
- Member
Offline
- Registered: 8/02/2017
- Posts: 670
Re: If It Wasn't For That ?#! $! Dan Mullen Article
The MSU fans had been assured that none of their antics against Ole Miss was going to blow back on "Dear Old State." Now some of them are beginning to sweat a little. Steve Robertson now has seven days to convince the Mississippi Supreme Court why that Court should not hold him and one other individual in contempt for their actions associated with Booster 14. That ratchets this to whole new level.
- Ellisvillereb
- Member
Offline
- From: Ellisville Ms.
- Registered: 8/01/2017
- Posts: 1,368
Re: If It Wasn't For That ?#! $! Dan Mullen Article
From what ive learned from this , that the NCAA can do whatever they want , fair or not. Buy if we go down , state should go down also.
- •
Thread Starter- Themob
- Member
Offline
- Registered: 8/02/2017
- Posts: 1,025
Re: If It Wasn't For That ?#! $! Dan Mullen Article
what lopaz states is more than likely true in terms of what he overheard. But 1, it is hearsay even under oath unless it can be corroborated with other evidence. 2, The joneses come out and admit this is true. 3, lopaz has this recorded in which he can produce during court hearing.
I am just tired of all the potential implications and ready for concrete facts and evidence.
- MeridianOMRebel
- Administrator
Offline
- Registered: 8/01/2017
- Posts: 3,397
Re: If It Wasn't For That ?#! $! Dan Mullen Article
Semper wrote:
Steve Robertson now has seven days to convince the Mississippi Supreme Court why that Court should not hold him and one other individual in contempt for their actions associated with Booster 14.
I haven't heard about this. Was there a story online that I missed?
- catfishboy
- Administrator
Offline
- Registered: 8/01/2017
- Posts: 6,868
Re: If It Wasn't For That ?#! $! Dan Mullen Article
What is the scoop on this tidbit?
(c) All rights reserved. Content may not be copied, transposed, or used in any manner or form without expressed written permission of user.
- Semper
- Member
Offline
- Registered: 8/02/2017
- Posts: 670
Re: If It Wasn't For That ?#! $! Dan Mullen Article
Steve Robertson now has seven days to convince the Mississippi Supreme Court why that Court should not hold him and one other individual in contempt for their actions associated with Booster 14.
I haven't heard about this. Was there a story online that I missed?
It was posted on the Spirit board Friday afternoon with a copy of a portion of the order. Now I can't find it. It was posted by one of the mods, I think. I hope it wasn't a hoax.
- catfishboy
- Administrator
Offline
- Registered: 8/01/2017
- Posts: 6,868
Re: If It Wasn't For That ?#! $! Dan Mullen Article
Would the order be posted in some county or with the State of MS? Also, what dd these perps allegedly do to be in contempt?
(c) All rights reserved. Content may not be copied, transposed, or used in any manner or form without expressed written permission of user.
- catfishboy
- Administrator
Offline
- Registered: 8/01/2017
- Posts: 6,868
Re: If It Wasn't For That ?#! $! Dan Mullen Article
DATA BELOW FOUND ON ANOTHER SITE:
Sounds like to me that the Court ordered them (appellees) to respond to the motion to enforce stay (filed by Joe Doe) by 8/17 and they did not do so. So it looks like they now still have to respond to the motion and also provide why they should not be held in contempt of court.
=14.3pxI am not a lawyer but from what I understand, Joe Doe filed a motion for an expedited stay which was granted. It looks like Robertson did not file a response requested by the court, so this may be why the contempt statement is made. Below is a copy and paste from the document I linked below that provides more information.
Three days later, on August 18, 2017, this Court granted, in part, Doe’s request for an “expedited stay” and directed the Appellees to file their respective responses. Robertson has not taken any action in furtherance of the public records request since that time.
CLICK BELOW FOR THE COURT DOCUMENT:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO.: 2017-TS-01137 - ROBERTSON’S RESPONSE TO APPELLANT’S MOTION TO ENFORCE STAY
Last edited by catfishboy (8/28/2017 2:32 pm)
(c) All rights reserved. Content may not be copied, transposed, or used in any manner or form without expressed written permission of user.
- catfishboy
- Administrator
Offline
- Registered: 8/01/2017
- Posts: 6,868
Re: If It Wasn't For That ?#! $! Dan Mullen Article
Click below for General Docket on Case:
APPELLATE COURTS GENERAL DOCKET
CASE: 2017-TS-01137
John Doe v. Steve Robertson
Last edited by catfishboy (8/28/2017 2:51 pm)
(c) All rights reserved. Content may not be copied, transposed, or used in any manner or form without expressed written permission of user.