- Johnny Yuma
- Member
Offline 
- Registered: 8/01/2017
- Posts: 1,402
Re: Why Bjork Hired Luke
Rebelbowhunter wrote:
And now they're circling the wagons trying to BS us into supporting this "stump" blindly. It will be a total propaganda blitz and if you don't jump on the merry go round they will then try to shame you into silence.......it's worked for them in the past and they'll go back to their playbook of old favorites to control opinion.
Absolutely what we are seeing and the media spin machine is at full tilt.
After all these years they still haven't learned you can't clamp a lid down on a boiling pot..... It might work for a bit but when the inevitable occurs the resulting 'explosion' is much more destructive.
Last edited by Johnny Yuma (11/30/2017 2:01 pm)
He was panther quick and Leather tough.
If he figured that He'd been pushed enough.
The Rebel----Johnny Yuma
- class77
- Member
Offline
- Registered: 8/10/2017
- Posts: 123
Re: Why Bjork Hired Luke
Even if you take Bjork at his word that Luke was the best coach for our situation(which I don't for a minute), Bjork's irresponsibility with OMAF funds is an indictment. He's paying Luke 3 million when he should be paying him no more than 1-1.5 million with a SMALL buyout($200,000) if we see a mistake has been made. As I understand it, Matt will be set for life with a payout of .65 of the remaining contract whatever that may be. Also why increase the pool for the same group up to $5.1 million? That would seem to be a large increase for all coaches when the team only had a 6-6 record. If Matt needed to hire a Roper or a Mazzone or some other retread Luke knows, surely Bjork could make the money available at that time.