Ole Miss Rebels Sports

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



2/04/2023 7:28 am  #1


Ole Miss athletics saw a revenue uptick, but operated at $5.2M deficit

Ole Miss athletics saw a revenue uptick, but operated at $5.2M deficit in 2022. Here's why 

OXFORD — Ole Miss athletics operated at a deficit of $5,239,053 during the 2022 fiscal year (July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022) according to an NCAA Financial Report posted by the athletic department this week. 

Ole Miss' total revenues are up over $6 million from the 2021 fiscal year, when it finished with a surplus of over $17.6 million. But the athletic department's expenses rose by roughly $29 million in this reporting period. 

Below are the expense categories with the largest year-over-year increases that have led to the increase in athletic department spending: 

Expense Category                                    Spending FY 2021   Spending FY 2022
Coaching compensation                                       $21,537,187    $28,144,913
"Other" operating expenses                                    $2,231,180    $6,201,275
Direct overhead & administrative expenses         $10,830,897    $16,068,063
Support and administrative staff compensation    $18,340,020    $21,143,600
Guarantees to visiting institutions                              $592,289    $3,074,450
Recruiting                                                                   $339,608    $2,506,402
Team travel                                                             $5,006,343     $7,273,294
Athletic student aid                                               $10,937,684   $12,299,989

Despite the deficit, the 2022 report paints a healthier financial picture for Ole Miss athletics. In 2021, the athletic department profited because of $37,825,399 in non-media SEC distributions, with a large chunk of that coming from COVID-19 relief payments provided by the conference to its member institutions. Those payments were financed by future TV rights, according to previous reporting from USA Today.

 SOURCE: Eckert, David. "Ole Miss athletics saw a revenue uptick, but operated at $5.2M deficit in 2022. Here's why." Mississippi Clarion Ledger, 3 February 2023, https://www.tennessean.com/story/sports/college/ole-miss/2023/02/02/ole-miss-athletics-saw-a-revenue-growth-but-operated-at-deficit-in-2022/69867371007/
Mississippi Clarion Ledger 

Last edited by catfishboy (2/04/2023 7:32 am)


(c) All rights reserved.  Content may not be copied, transposed, or used in any manner or form without expressed written permission of user.

 

2/04/2023 2:41 pm  #2


Re: Ole Miss athletics saw a revenue uptick, but operated at $5.2M deficit

catfishboy wrote:

Ole Miss athletics saw a revenue uptick, but operated at $5.2M deficit in 2022. Here's why 

OXFORD — Ole Miss athletics operated at a deficit of $5,239,053 during the 2022 fiscal year (July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022) according to an NCAA Financial Report posted by the athletic department this week. 

Ole Miss' total revenues are up over $6 million from the 2021 fiscal year, when it finished with a surplus of over $17.6 million. But the athletic department's expenses rose by roughly $29 million in this reporting period. 

Below are the expense categories with the largest year-over-year increases that have led to the increase in athletic department spending: 

Expense Category                                    Spending FY 2021   Spending FY 2022
Coaching compensation                                       $21,537,187    $28,144,913
"Other" operating expenses                                    $2,231,180    $6,201,275
Direct overhead & administrative expenses         $10,830,897    $16,068,063
Support and administrative staff compensation    $18,340,020    $21,143,600
Guarantees to visiting institutions                              $592,289    $3,074,450
Recruiting                                                                   $339,608    $2,506,402
Team travel                                                             $5,006,343     $7,273,294
Athletic student aid                                               $10,937,684   $12,299,989

Despite the deficit, the 2022 report paints a healthier financial picture for Ole Miss athletics. In 2021, the athletic department profited because of $37,825,399 in non-media SEC distributions, with a large chunk of that coming from COVID-19 relief payments provided by the conference to its member institutions. Those payments were financed by future TV rights, according to previous reporting from USA Today.

 SOURCE: Eckert, David. "Ole Miss athletics saw a revenue uptick, but operated at $5.2M deficit in 2022. Here's why." Mississippi Clarion Ledger, 3 February 2023, https://www.tennessean.com/story/sports/college/ole-miss/2023/02/02/ole-miss-athletics-saw-a-revenue-growth-but-operated-at-deficit-in-2022/69867371007/
Mississippi Clarion Ledger 

And Biden proudly proclaims, "I did that!"
 

 

2/05/2023 11:42 am  #3


Re: Ole Miss athletics saw a revenue uptick, but operated at $5.2M deficit

"And Biden proudly proclaims, "I did that!""

Yep, Biden absolutely sucks but let's not pretend Trump didn't do the same thing with reckless spending. Not a damn bit of difference between the duopoly. Both are idiots when it comes to economics (and most of everything else) and they suddenly only care when "the other party" is in the WH.

 

2/05/2023 9:29 pm  #4


Re: Ole Miss athletics saw a revenue uptick, but operated at $5.2M deficit

To be fair, I'd say Trump knows a good bit more about economics than Slow Joe. 


The early bird gets the worm, the 'second' mouse gets the cheese.  mark twain
 

2/08/2023 7:32 am  #5


Re: Ole Miss athletics saw a revenue uptick, but operated at $5.2M deficit

I have a feeling that those numbers will change on the next fiscal year.  That one ended June 2022. 

Football this season brought in considerably more revenue.  Sold out games, merch, etc. 

TV money goes up from the SEC network etc

 

2/08/2023 7:36 am  #6


Re: Ole Miss athletics saw a revenue uptick, but operated at $5.2M deficit

Amazing The first fiscal year this is what they had in the budget and spent on recruiting. 340K

I am speechless.  La Tech spent more.




Recruiting         

2021.            2022
                                                         
$339,608    $2,506,402

Last edited by Rock1Aggie (2/08/2023 7:37 am)

 

2/09/2023 3:23 am  #7


Re: Ole Miss athletics saw a revenue uptick, but operated at $5.2M deficit

$340k on recruiting is a drop in the bucket for most top schools.  It would be good to see what other schools spend recruiting.  This is Pete Boone money for recruiting, but it would probably be less!!!


(c) All rights reserved.  Content may not be copied, transposed, or used in any manner or form without expressed written permission of user.

     Thread Starter
 

2/09/2023 2:15 pm  #8


Re: Ole Miss athletics saw a revenue uptick, but operated at $5.2M deficit

https://localtoday.news/tx/check-out-where-texas-ranks-among-the-highest-recruiting-budgets-165732.html

Top 5 in 2022

Georgia 4.5
A&M 2.98 mil
Tennessee 2.92
Texas 2.44
Alabama 2.32

OM says they had 2.55 in 2022, not sure what they add in that those top 5 teams didn’t to get their numbers.    But I am guessing that OM is in the top 10 now.


But with NIL I am not sure this budgeted amount in the yearly budget matters as much as it used to.

The money in the NIL collective by boosters, to actually pay the players is the most important now.

Athetic departments need to find a way to cut half that recruiting budget and funnel it to the NIL Collectives.  It would be better used there for results.

But cuts won’t happen because the athetic department’s are used to so much fat nowadays and like the Government will fight to death not to give up anything

Last edited by Rock1Aggie (2/09/2023 2:22 pm)

 

2/09/2023 10:33 pm  #9


Re: Ole Miss athletics saw a revenue uptick, but operated at $5.2M deficit

With the government and probably lots of other entities, if they budget a certain amount and there is a surplus remaining just before the end of the budget period, they spend it so they won't get their budget slashed next period.  It is a big waste and you have to wonder why they are not encouraged to move the surplus to next year's budget and still keep the same or a higher amount.


(c) All rights reserved.  Content may not be copied, transposed, or used in any manner or form without expressed written permission of user.

     Thread Starter
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum