Offline
Semper wrote:
olemissjcj wrote:
The real "hammering" is going to be when ncaa allows underclassmen immediate eligibility with transfers.
They might indeed allow that, but it will set a very dangerous precedent with implications far beyond the Ole Miss case. Where does “being misled” end? What about a player promised a scholarship but told after signing he had to grey shirt? A player promised playing time who does nothing but sit on the bench? A player promised a certain position but moved to another after signing? I can envision lawyers having much better cases with these than Mars has with Ole Miss.
This is so right about setting precedent. Maybe they will call it the "Ole Miss Rule"!!! You can be assured that if the NCAA allows underclassmen to transfer without sitting out a year, then other players from other teams can do the same and claim they were not told the truth by the coach when they were recruited.
Offline
Come on guys. How many years of unprecedented moves have been made against Ole Miss? We are the poster child for the NCAA flexing its muscle and looking somewhat legitimate.
Meanwhile schools like Bama, Auburn, Miami, NC, Oklahoma, OkSt, etc thumb their noses at the NCAA without reprise. Lyin Leo point blank told the NCAA that he got paid by moou and they haven't even been investigated.
This early transfer thing is just part of the larger picture of what the NCAA elected to do since they couldn't punish us as much as they wanted with evidence so they let conjecture, speculation and clouds of uncertainty hang around, get published by their puppets in the mainstream national media all lead a narrative that serves as the foundation for players to use as being lied to, deceived and misled.