Offline
zreb wrote:
I certainly understand and can appreciate the other side of the Freeze argument. I dk where it all jumped the tracks for him, maybe coming from a HS teacher/coach's income to 7 figures ( money changes some people)and the adulation of fans and kids or exactly what but I bet he wishes he had to do over again. From being embraced to being rejected has to be an emotional fall. OM will never get a proven big time coach however if we get a coach who becomes one, I think we'll do a better job $$$$ of keeping him. In the meantime, muddle onward!
I think the celebrity aspect caught up to him, to be honest. I think the social aspect of that would really change someone and prevent them from staying grounded. Of course, he may have always had the skeletons in his closet...
Having said that, I hope he has turned his life around and he becomes a redemption story.
Offline
I think it is crazy that damn near everyone thinks that he will get a big time job in the next few years and that he will be successful at it.
That sounds to me like reasons why we should hire him. We don't pay him to be a choir boy. We pay him to win games. It seems to me that nearly everyone agrees that the man wins games. So why not do what a good program would do and get him back here to win some damn games?
We weren't too worried about morality to hire Rich Rod. We weren't too worried about morality with Brewer. Hell, even Nutt and Orgeron had some skeletons yet we hired them.
Forget the reasons why not to. Let's go get the obvious winner that could be swayed to come back and play it out as a redemption story.
Offline
Semper wrote:
For some, Freeze is like that old girl friend with whom you had a bad break up but continues to lives rent free in your head 24/7. Here's a married man and father of young daughters who was trolling for prostitutes while on official recruiting trips for Ole Miss. Personal forgiveness for that behavior is one thing. Each of us can decide for ourselves about that. The issue is how that behavior would impact Freeze at Ole Miss were he to be head coach here again. If I'm a mother or father of a 17 or 18 year-old son, do I want to entrust his college football career to man who was was trolling for prostitutes on the company dime? You can rest assured that coaches of opposing schools won't be too subtle in using this against Freeze on the recruiting trail. I have no animosity against Hugh Freeze and hope he can get his coaching career back on track. I just don't think it's best for him or Ole Miss that he return here.
I like Hugh Freeze. I don't know whether or not he would be successful in a return to Oxford. I do know two things though. Saban wanted him on staff and tried to make it happen, and two, Mullen's team attending recruiting trips at the Pink Pony (as reported in news) didn't keep him from coaching at Florida. I guess you could also add Orgeron's team trashing hotel rooms while at Ole Miss. My point is that every coaching candidate comes with a past. Some just hide it better.
Last edited by OleMissPreacher (11/07/2019 12:46 pm)
Offline
I would like to add that even the NCAA did not blame him for our violations. That fell all on the head of the athletic department which was headed by Bjork.
Offline
As Semper mentioned above, getting recruits or parents to trust Freeze would be hard to do after his deceitful escapades. There is no doubt that every coach and opposing recruiter would use Freeze's jaded past as a weapon against him. It is unfortunate that Freeze could not continue his success, but his self righteousness and ego go in the way of his progress.
Many people who were around him from Memphis HS days to the Ole Miss days indicate that Freeze always wanted to be the most important person in the room and he let everyone know it. This attitude caused some animosities with some donors who would probably block any attempt to bring Freeze back to Ole Miss.
Offline
Why does "everyone" think Freeze will win big again and get a big job again? I will believe it when I see it but I'm very skeptical it will happen. He got lucky on a few early recruits which set the tone for some other talented skill players but if that hadn't happened how successful would he have really been? Liberty wins 6 games a year consistently and they are 6-3 now with potential to win 2 more (with one of those being a second game against terrible New Mexico St). Is that such a feat?
I'll give him credit, it was a fun 3 years but the game caught up with him and the last two years would have been just as bad if not worse. Defenses were terrible and we were a one-trick pony on offense. That's all on him.
I'm all for moving on from Luke but let's find someone new to start fresh and rebuild the program (again).
Offline
mtc900 wrote:
Why does "everyone" think Freeze will win big again and get a big job again? ...
Because he the top offensive minded genius in football. Just ask him and he will tell you!!! 🙃
Offline
mtc900 wrote:
Why does "everyone" think Freeze will win big again and get a big job again? I will believe it when I see it but I'm very skeptical it will happen. He got lucky on a few early recruits which set the tone for some other talented skill players but if that hadn't happened how successful would he have really been? Liberty wins 6 games a year consistently and they are 6-3 now with potential to win 2 more (with one of those being a second game against terrible New Mexico St). Is that such a feat?
I'll give him credit, it was a fun 3 years but the game caught up with him and the last two years would have been just as bad if not worse. Defenses were terrible and we were a one-trick pony on offense. That's all on him.
I'm all for moving on from Luke but let's find someone new to start fresh and rebuild the program (again).
Last 2 years wasn't fun? I guess that includes one of our best seasons ever (2015) and the Sugar Bowl. Granted, 2016 was a disappointment but we blew out Georgia and we played Bama to the wire. I'll take Hugh's last 2 years over any other 2 years since the 1970s.
Offline
Sooper_Rebel wrote:
Last 2 years wasn't fun? I guess that includes one of our best seasons ever (2015) and the Sugar Bowl. Granted, 2016 was a disappointment but we blew out Georgia and we played Bama to the wire. I'll take Hugh's last 2 years over any other 2 years since the 1970s.
3 fun years: 2013-2015. 2016 wasn't so much. The last 2 years (2017,2018) wouldn't have been better than 2016 if Freeze was coaching.
So my point is we would be at 3 seasons of 6-6 or worse (likely 4) if he was still here. Would you still be happy with him then?
Offline
mtc900 wrote:
Sooper_Rebel wrote:
Last 2 years wasn't fun? I guess that includes one of our best seasons ever (2015) and the Sugar Bowl. Granted, 2016 was a disappointment but we blew out Georgia and we played Bama to the wire. I'll take Hugh's last 2 years over any other 2 years since the 1970s.
3 fun years: 2013-2015. 2016 wasn't so much. The last 2 years (2017,2018) wouldn't have been better than 2016 if Freeze was coaching.
So my point is we would be at 3 seasons of 6-6 or worse (likely 4) if he was still here. Would you still be happy with him then?
How can you say that? You say they wouldn't have been any better. I say that they would have been better. Neither of us would know because he did not have the chance. What I do see is that Freeze has won immediately at every place he has coached regardless of how bad they were the season before.